Survivalist Pro
Photo by Skylar Kang Pexels Logo Photo: Skylar Kang

Can earthquakes come again?

An earthquake can take place at the "slopes" of a large asperity but fail to rupture towards the "top" It can however rupture towards the perimeter and achieve respectable sizes. Then another earthquake can take place nearby, but still low at the "slopes".

What is the best gaming setup ever?
What is the best gaming setup ever?

PC Hardware CPU: Intel Core i9 12900k. GPU: ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 3090 Ti. Motherboard: ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme Glacial. RAM: 64GB Corsair...

Read More »
What is the best way to plan ahead?
What is the best way to plan ahead?

Look into the future. In the workplace, it's better to be proactive than reactive. ... Anticipate needs. To anticipate needs means to see a need...

Read More »

$egingroup$

It can happen but not like you may guess.

I believe you have seen rupture maps for large earthquakes, such as the 2011 Japan earthquake. In that earthquake, a foreshock of 7.3 took place at the perimeter of the area of largest slip during the main earthquake. This could be interpreted like this (using the asperity model): the foreshock hit at the "slopes" of the asperity but failed to "climb" up immediately; aftershocks were slowly migrating towards the "top" of the asperity, then the main shock happened. Furthermore, once the whole fault was activated, slip at the shallowest parts went beyond charts (40, 50, even 80m of slip were reported locally). The main (deep) asperity had the fewest aftershocks (it slipped completely and without restraints), but there were enough of them in the shallowest parts of the fault. This is probably because the shallower slip was not due to an asperity but rather due to diffused slip of unconsolidated sediments (the "bookshelf" model was used, plus there were aftershocks that appeared to actually... pull back the pieces closer to their original locations). Anyways let's focus on the deeper asperity. An earthquake can take place at the "slopes" of a large asperity but fail to rupture towards the "top" It can however rupture towards the perimeter and achieve respectable sizes. Then another earthquake can take place nearby, but still low at the "slopes". Finally an earthquake can climb over the top and force even the previously ruptured areas to re-rupture. All 3 earthquakes can very well have epicenters pretty close to one another (such as the two eastern Nepal aftershocks recently). It seems that the 1960 huge Valdivia earthquake demonstrated this behavior but I have yet to find a good, detailed, open-access study on it. Concerning Fred's answer, unfortunately Bilham (he mentions Jones and Molnar, 1986) (search for "preceded") says that 10% of strong earthquakes in the history of Himalaya have been preceded by strong shocks. Other sources support Fred's answer, but I would choose to believe Bilham. Concerning the "lots of aftershocks" notice that the author of the question pointed, for a given earthquake with a normal aftershock sequence it is expected that its strongest aftershock is 1.2 magnitude smaller than the mainshock. For this case, this would yield 6.6. In fact, the strongest ones were the 7.3, an 6.7 and a 6.6, so yes this is anomalous, but the empirical 1.2 value I mentioned is a bit smaller for Himalayas. Still, an 7.3 is anomalously large but before that time we had no reason to suspect an anomalous aftershock sequence (to my knowledge of course, I searched for b-values but did not find anything during the first days of aftershock activity).

What is the most suicidal state?
What is the most suicidal state?

Wyoming By state Rank State Suicide rate per 100,000 people 1 Wyoming 29.3 2 Alaska 28.5 3 Montana 26.2 4 New Mexico 24 46 more rows

Read More »
Does Kim Kardashian sleep in make up?
Does Kim Kardashian sleep in make up?

“The one talent that I have,” said Kim in an Allure YouTube video called Kim Kardashian Answers Beauty Questions from the Internet, “it's probably...

Read More »

How strong is a level 7 earthquake?

Earthquake Magnitude Scale Magnitude Earthquake Effects 5.5 to 6.0 Slight damage to buildings and other structures. 6.1 to 6.9 May cause a lot of damage in very populated areas. 7.0 to 7.9 Major earthquake. Serious damage. 8.0 or greater Great earthquake. Can totally destroy communities near the epicenter. 2 more rows

Magnitude scales can be used to describe earthquakes so small that they are expressed in negative numbers. The scale also has no upper limit. Learn more about how we measure earthquake magnitude. Earthquake Magnitude Scale Magnitude Earthquake Effects Estimated Number Each Year 2.5 or less Usually not felt, but can be recorded by seismograph. Millions 2.5 to 5.4 Often felt, but only causes minor damage. 500,000 5.5 to 6.0 Slight damage to buildings and other structures. 350 6.1 to 6.9 May cause a lot of damage in very populated areas. 100 7.0 to 7.9 Major earthquake. Serious damage. 10-15 8.0 or greater Great earthquake. Can totally destroy communities near the epicenter. One every year or two

Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale

Why is my poop sticking to the toilet?
Why is my poop sticking to the toilet?

Sticky stool is usually a sign that your diet needs some adjustment — maybe a little less fat or some more water. But sticky stool can also be a...

Read More »
Do people prefer PS5 or Xbox?
Do people prefer PS5 or Xbox?

Games and Exclusives According to many studies, it's been found that the majority of the gamers prefer to buy PS5 and the only reason for that is...

Read More »
What do you call someone who doesn't age?
What do you call someone who doesn't age?

Ageless is an adjective describing a person or thing whose age cannot be defined, is non-existent, or appears not to change. It can also describe...

Read More »
Which cancers have the lowest survival rate?
Which cancers have the lowest survival rate?

Cancer survival rates by cancer type The cancers with the lowest five-year survival estimates are mesothelioma (7.2%), pancreatic cancer (7.3%) and...

Read More »