Survivalist Pro
Photo: Pixabay
3 C's of communicating science: Clarity, Creativity, Curiosity.
The Black Bess was a Mark IV Female that served at the Battle of Cambrai in 1917. The fate of the tank is largely unknown — it was either destroyed...
Read More »
People might subscribe to using more digital devices than reading copies of books in the near future, but books will not be entirely replaced by...
Read More »Although the rain came down unexpectedly in Pasadena on May 6, it did not stop more than 30 researchers and scientists from attending Sense About Science USA’s first 2016 Public Engagement Workshop for Scientists at California Institute of Technology (Caltech). They came from within the university as well as from the nearby Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) to talk about why public discussions about science are important and how scientists can effectively initiate those conversations. The day began with two scientists from Caltech, Sean Carroll, Ph.D., professor of Physics, and Joann Stock, Ph.D., professor of Geology and Geophysics, talking about their experiences with doing public outreach and why they think it is an important part of their work. “It is not the responsibility of all scientists to do public outreach,” Carroll said, “but it is important for our fields’ survival. So the burden is on those of us who do it well.” According to Carroll, there are two types of academic research: that which is practical and useful to society, and that which is too theoretical to be useful to society (at least for now). For those scientists whose work falls into the first category, it behooves them to discuss this with the very public affected by their research; and for scientists whose work falls in the second category, it is even more vital to participate in public discussions because they need to convince society that funding curiosity is important. Stock, a seismologist, knows all too well that the research she does and discoveries she makes can have an effect on people outside of her lab. Reporters often call on her to provide context in TV or radio interviews after an earthquake has occurred, especially Spanish language outlets as she can speak the language. The unexpected outcome of this is that since she’s not a native Spanish speaker, she uses simpler words and jargon-free explanations; this is a good reminder for her of how scientists need to speak in simple terms and concepts rather than their field’s complex terminology.
As a general rule of thumb, your height can be predicted based on how tall your parents are. If they are tall or short, then your own height is...
Read More »
Irresistible men know that a combination of honesty, kindness, humor, and confidence result in charisma. These are traits everyone wants to have,...
Read More »
the Tsar Bomba The largest and most powerful thermo nuclear weapon of all time was the RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, also known as the Tsar Bomba. On 30...
Read More »
Tap Water, Brita water filters do not actually kill the microorganisms that may be found in your in-home water supply. In fact, because the filter...
Read More »
The 2022 Top Landowners in the Land Report 100: The Emmerson Family – 2.33 million acres. John Malone – 2.2 million acres. Reed Family – 2.1...
Read More »
Worst States to Live in 2022 State Total Crime Washington 1 19 Minnesota 2 15 Utah 3 8 New Hampshire 4 1 43 more rows
Read More »