Survivalist Pro
Photo: Anna Nekrashevich
Join the Community The median income worldwide — the amount that is dead middle between the least and the highest amounts — is $850 US Dollars (USD). People who have incomes of $41,000 USD are in the top 3% in terms of the richest people in the world.
The 'Alone' rules dictate what food items contestants could bring. Before the Alone producers drop participants into their territory in the...
Read More »
Helmets have a limited lifespan because the resin and other materials used in the manufacturing process over time can be effected by your body...
Read More »The median income worldwide — the amount that is dead middle between the least and the highest amounts — is $850 US Dollars (USD). People who have incomes of $41,000 USD are in the top 3% in terms of the richest people in the world. If the trillion dollar worldwide economy were evenly split up between Earth's 6.7 billion people, the average income would be $7,000 USD.
Ever since, the Ukrainian Air Force has been downsizing and upgrading its forces. The main inventory of the air force still consists of Soviet-made...
Read More »
Fencing your woodland Depending on how you want to use your woodland, you may want to create some sort of boundary fence or hedge. Fencing can keep...
Read More »browncoat May 25, 2013 @anon334952 - Africa is also a big place with a lot of different standards of living. I actually think it's really unfortunate that all anyone thinks of when they think of a generic "Africa" is poor people who are constantly on the verge of dying, because, while there are a lot of poor people there, there is a growing middle class as well. I lived in West Africa for a while and I actually agree a little bit that $2 can be more than it sounds when people don't have rent to pay and food and other commodities are cheap. The problem is that infrastructure remains expensive and $2 or $20 isn't going to matter when there's no clean water available within a hundred miles of your village. pleonasm May 25, 2013 @TRMOhio - The equation is not as simple as the idea that people should limit their children to one or two and would then be able to feed themselves better. Two dollars remains two dollars, when split between four or eight and, if anything, having more children means those families (sadly) have more potential sources of income. Even more sadly, often they have many children because they know there's a great chance many of them will die. Usually not from lack of food, which isn't really as big a problem as lack of medicine and lack of education. As to the idea of taking from the rich. How about the rich stop taking from the poor? I'd be happy enough with that solution. anon334952 May 16, 2013 "living off the land in Montana or in Africa"? Montana and Africa are not even close in terms of standards of living, infrastructure, or trade. People in Montana are not a bunch of hicks living off the land with little trade and everyone growing their own food. anon331528 April 23, 2013 "Taking from the “rich” has been tried many times, and always has failed." I always love seeing this myth. It's a great opportunity to look down on people. Get informed, and see the richest people in the world are the North European/Scandinavian countries. Look at any listing on anything of value like health care, education, cultural participation, salary equality, and see the USA tumbling down next to poor African countries. TRMOhio March 21, 2013 I do feel sorry for the poor and hungry. If they limited their family to one or two children, they might be able to feed themselves. Of course, if you live in NY City, or any complex society, everything has to be paid for with money. But living off the land in Montana or in Africa, where there is little trade, you grow your own food, and the need for cash money is much smaller. Over the generations, we get what our parents and grandparents invested for a better future. Without that sacrifice, the standard of living does not improve. Taking from the “rich” has been tried many times, and always has failed. So, people in the US who envy the rich, even to the point of forced “sharing” need to see that world-wide sharing would take from them!
The easy experimental answer to this question is 264 hours (about 11 days). Mar 25, 2002
Read More »
SERE specialists are located at a large amount of Air Force bases. The preponderance of SERE specialists reside at Fairchild AFB, WA, where the Air...
Read More »anon303565 9 hours ago Three billion people in the world live on less than $2 USD per day. Just repeat that.
According to surveys, a reasonable number of handbags a classy woman must have is six or seven. There is a handbag particularly curated for every...
Read More »
transversus abdominis – the deepest muscle layer. Its main roles are to stabilise the trunk and maintain internal abdominal pressure. rectus...
Read More »
"The free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 6:23; "By grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of...
Read More »
Liquid chlorine bleach (unscented) can be used to disinfect water for long-term storage. Use fresh chlorine bleach since it can lose up to half its...
Read More »