Survivalist Pro
Photo: Matthias Groeneveld
The values of peace, freedom, social progress, equal rights and human dignity, enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, are no less valid today than when, over half a century ago, those documents were drafted by representatives of many different nations and ...
30 Facts About Pregnancy 30 facts about pregnancy. The longest recorded pregnancy was 375 days. According to a 1945 entry in Time Magazine, a woman...
Read More »
First he referred to the now-ousted Bill Posley as "ghetto trash" and recommended he kill himself. Then he referred to Leif Manson as an "Oompa...
Read More »Following is the text of the lecture by Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Global Ethics, entitled “Do We Still Have Universal Values?”, delivered today at Tübingen University, Germany: Let me start by thanking Professor Küng –- not only for that very kind introduction, but also for inviting me here to give this lecture. I was deeply touched when, eighteen months ago in Berlin, he handed me a note asking me to do this as a birthday gift for him, at any time after his 75th birthday on 19 March 2003. As you know, dear Hans, I had not intended to make you wait so long for your birthday present. I had hoped to be here on April 30th. The pressure of world events made that impossible, but here I am now. And yet I cannot really think of this lecture as a gift from me to you. It is you who do me a great honour, by asking me to speak on your home turf, on a subject –- global ethics –- about which you have thought as profoundly as anyone in our time. Indeed, I realise now that the title I chose for my lecture might even strike you as a little offensive. When someone has written as extensively and inspiringly about universal values as you have, it seems rather impertinent for me to march right into your Global Ethics Foundation and question whether we still have such things at all! Let me spare you any suspense, and tell you right now that my answer is Yes! The values of peace, freedom, social progress, equal rights and human dignity, enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, are no less valid today than when, over half a century ago, those documents were drafted by representatives of many different nations and cultures. And they were not any more fully realized in actual human conduct at that time than they are now. Those great documents expressed an optimistic vision, not a description of existing realities. Let’s not forget that among the States that drafted and signed them was the Soviet Union, at the height of Stalin’s terror, as well as several unrepentant colonial powers. The values of our founders are still not fully realized. Alas, far from it. But they are much more broadly accepted today than they were a few decades ago. The Universal Declaration, in particular, has been accepted in legal systems across the world, and has become a point of reference for people who long for human rights in every country. The world has improved, and the United Nations has made an important contribution. But universal values are also more acutely needed, in this age of globalization, than ever before. Every society needs to be bound together by common values, so that its members know what to expect of each other, and have some shared principles by which to manage their differences without resorting to violence. That is true of local communities and of national communities. Today, as globalization brings us all closer together, and our lives are affected almost instantly by things that people say and do on the far side of the world, we also feel the need to live as a global community. And we can do so only if we have global values to bind us together. But recent events have shown that we cannot take our global values for granted. I sense a great deal of anxiety around the world that the fabric of international relations may be starting to unravel –- and that globalization itself may be in jeopardy. Globalization has brought great opportunities, but also many new stresses and dislocations. There is a backlash against it -- precisely because we have not managed it in accordance with the universal values we claim to believe in. In the Universal Declaration, we proclaimed that “everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services”. Just three years ago, in the Millennium Declaration, all States reaffirmed certain fundamental values as being “essential to international relations in the twenty-first century”: freedom, equality, solidarity, tolerance, respect for nature, and shared responsibility. They adopted practical, achievable targets –- the Millennium Development Goals –- for relieving the blight of extreme poverty and making such rights as education, basic health care and clean water a reality for all. Many millions of people in the world today are still far from enjoying these rights in practice. That could be changed, if governments in both rich and poor countries lived up to their commitments. Yet, three years after the Millennium Declaration, our attention is focused on issues of war and peace, and we are in danger of forgetting these solemn commitments to fulfil basic human rights and human needs. Globalization has brought us closer together in the sense that we are all affected by each other’s actions, but not in the sense that we all share the benefits and the burdens. Instead, we have allowed it to drive us further apart, increasing the disparities in wealth and power both between societies and within them. This makes a mockery of universal values. It is not surprising that, in the backlash, those values have come under attack, at the very moment when we most need them.
When skin and fat around the abdomen hang down, it can resemble an apron. As a result, some people refer to a pannus stomach as an “apron belly” or...
Read More »
The MP-443 Grach (Russian: MП-443 Грач, lit. 'rook') or "PYa", for "Pistolet Yarygina" ("Yarygin Pistol"), following traditional Russian naming...
Read More »Whether one looks at peace and security, at trade and markets, or at social and cultural attitudes, we seem to be in danger of living in an age of mutual distrust, fear and protectionism – an age when people turn in on themselves, instead of turning outwards to exchange with, and learn from, each other. Disillusioned with globalization, many people have retreated into narrower interpretations of community. This in turn leads to conflicting value systems, which encourage people to exclude some of their fellow human beings from the scope of their empathy and solidarity, because they do not share the same religious or political beliefs, or cultural heritage, or even skin colour. We have seen what disastrous consequences such particularist value systems can have: ethnic cleansing, genocide, terrorism, and the spread of fear, hatred and discrimination.
Let us know more about the nature of these big cats and how friendly they are. Lions can be friendly and tamed to a certain degree and may even...
Read More »
It is an essential method that is used by most parents to help kids feel less stressed at night. And while there is no question that there are...
Read More »We may all be genuinely committed to solidarity with our fellow human beings and a just economic order, and yet not agree which policies will be most effective in bringing about that order. We may all be deeply attached to tolerance and truthfulness, and yet not agree how tolerant we should be of States or systems that seem to us intolerant and untruthful. And we may all be genuinely committed to equal rights and partnership between men and women, without agreeing on how far the social roles of men and women should be differentiated, or whether it is the responsibility of society to enforce the sanctity of the marriage bond. On all such issues we must expect differences to continue for a long time -– between societies and within them. The function of universal values is not to eliminate all such differences, but rather to help us manage them with mutual respect, and without resorting to mutual destruction. Tolerance and dialogue are essential, because without them there is no peaceful exchange of ideas, and no way to arrive at agreed solutions allowing different societies to evolve in their own way. Those societies that consider themselves modern need to recognise that modernity does not automatically generate tolerance. Even sincere liberals and democrats can sometimes be remarkably intolerant of other views. One should always be on one’s guard against such temptations. On their side, societies that put a high premium on tradition need to recognise that traditions survive best, not when they are rigid and immutable, but when they are living and open to new ideas, from within and from without. It may also be true that, in the long run, tolerance and dialogue within a society are best guaranteed through particular institutional arrangements, such as multi-party elections, or the separation of powers between legislature, executive and judiciary. But these arrangements are means to an end, not the end in itself. No society should consider that, because it has found them useful, it has an absolute right or obligation to impose them on others. Each society should be given the space, not to distort or undermine universal values, but to express them in a way that reflects its own traditions and culture. Values are not there to serve philosophers or theologians, but to help people live their lives and organize their societies. So, at the international level, we need mechanisms of cooperation strong enough to insist on universal values, but flexible enough to help people realize those values in ways that they can actually apply in their specific circumstances. In the end history will judge us, not by what we say but by what we do. Those who preach certain values loudest –- such as the values of freedom, the rule of law, and equality before the law –- have a special obligation to live by those values in their own lives and their own societies, and to apply them to those they consider their enemies as well as their friends. You don’t need to be tolerant of those who share your opinions, or whose behaviour you approve. It is when we are angry that we most need to apply our proclaimed principles of humility and mutual respect. Nor should we ever be satisfied with things as they are. The state of the world does not allow that. In our own case, at the United Nations, we are sometimes tempted to proclaim our self-evident utility and relevance to the world, and to blame our Member States for not making better use of such a valuable institution. But that is not enough. We need to do everything we can to improve the United Nations –- that is, to make it more useful to the world’s peoples, in whose name it was founded, and more exemplary in applying the universal values that all its members claim to accept. That means that we need to be more effective in many aspects of our work, and especially in what we do to promote and protect human rights. Human rights and universal values are almost synonymous –- so long as we understand that rights do not exist in a vacuum. They entail a corresponding set of obligations, and obligations are only meaningful where there is the capacity to carry them out. “Ought implies can.” So what is my answer to the provocative question that I took as my title? Do we still have universal values? Yes, we do, but we should not take them for granted.
Full Results To Kill a Mockingbird. Outlander (Series) Harry Potter (Series) Pride and Prejudice. Lord of the Rings. Gone with the Wind....
Read More »
The Game Boy was stored inside the barracks one fateful day when Iraqi forces bombed the U.S. base. Fortunately, there were no casualties that day....
Read More »
Pond Plants that Help Filter Pond Water Water Hyacinth. Water Lettuce. Duckweed. Fairy Moss. Floating Fern. Sep 12, 2022
Read More »
1. JavaScript. With increasing demand for dynamic, single page web applications, it's nearly impossible to become a professional software developer...
Read More »